Senator Lieberman attacks WikiLeaks with SHIELD Act

Friday, December 3rd, 2010 By

File photo of Independent Democratic Senator Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut.

Sen. Lieberman ranks high among those who consider WikiLeaks a terrorist organization. (Photo Credit: Public Domain/U.S. Senate/Wikipedia)

Independent Democratic Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut, along with Republican Senators John Ensign of Nevada and Scott Brown of Massachusetts, have co-sponsored a bill that would effectively make what WikiLeaks does illegal, reports Wired. Entitled the Securing Human Intelligence and Enforcing Lawful Dissemination (SHIELD) Act, the proposed legislation would make it a federal crime for anyone to publish the name of a U.S. intelligence source.

Joe Lieberman wants to shield U.S. from transparency

While the SHIELD Act will not put Julian Assange or WikiLeaks in legal jeopardy over what has already happened with “Cablegate” – the Constitution prohibits ex post facto criminal laws – it will protect national security moving forward, said Joe Lieberman. In a written statement, Lieberman said that protecting the interests of the United States and its allies, including the safety of government employees and others who depend upon the security of classified information is paramount.

“This (SHIELD Act) will help hold people criminally accountable who endanger these sources of information that are vital to protecting our national security interests,” he said.

SHEILD Act amends Espionage Act

The proposed SHIELD Act would alter the verbiage of the Espionage Act in order to extend the protections already granted to various forms of classified data into the realm of human intelligence. As the SHIELD bill reads, it would become a criminal act to publish information “concerning the identity of a classified source or informant of an element of the intelligence community of the United States” or “concerning the human intelligence activities of the United States or any foreign government” if the data is “prejudicial to U.S. interests.”

From video games to WikiLeaks

In what could perhaps be called a step up the ladder in terms of importance, Wired points out that Sen. Joe Lieberman has come a long way since co-sponsoring the failed 2005 Family Entertainment Protection Act bill, which would have called for a federal mandate on the enforcement of the Entertainment Software Ratings Board system. After leading the charge to pressure Amazon.com and data visualization company Tableau to blacklist Julian Assange’s WikiLeaks, Sen. Lieberman’s bill could raise a host of questions journalists covering the intelligence community will be forced to consider.

Sources

Washington Post

Wired

Text of the Shield Act

Shield Act

Previous Article

« Maccabeats | Jewish glee group gives Hanukkah a new beat

The Jewish a cappella group Maccabeats' song "Candlelight" has gone viral. But the Maccabeats are not the only Jewish pop music group around. Drediel
Next Article

Mastermind of Mega-D botnet sent 10 billion spam e-mails a day »

Oleg Nikolaenko was arraigned Friday after being indicted as the ringleader of a network accountable for 32 percent of the world's spam... spam botnet 10 billion a day

If you found this article helpful, share it with a friend!

  • InDenial

    Who in our history would have been prosecuted as an "unauthorised person" if the SHEILD had been in effect?

  • DevaronDLH

    If there was nothing to hide people like Lieberman would have nothing to say about any of this. His massive protests only shout out to the world how guilty he is of the deceit and treachery WikiLeaks points to. Now this guy has created a new Bill to hide behind. Mr. Lieberman obviously has not thought the matter through. If he would stop jerking long enough to look he would see that he and his unethical political buddies have been setup by people higher in the food chain. This type of information does not get released by accident or without specific intent. Someone very powerful, more powerful than you is at work here…. you might want to look into that area, because if it is true than this bill won't protect you from anything.

    • InDenile

      thoughtfull